Gorillas, Chimpanzees, and the Limits of Human Fighting Ability
Holston's grappling background shapes not only how he handles animals but also how he thinks and speaks about the physical gap between humans and other species. In a 2026 interview, he offered a series of assessments about various animals that drew directly on his combined experience as a handler and a martial artist.
On gorillas, Holston was unequivocal: the animal would "absolutely destroy every human being on the planet" — a claim he extended without exception regardless of human size or fighting ability. Chimpanzees, he argued, represent a distinct and in some ways more unsettling category of threat. Where a gorilla might kill outright, a chimpanzee would maul without killing, leaving a victim alive and in prolonged agony — a scenario Holston described as uniquely terrifying. He also pushed back against a widespread underestimation of dogs, noting that certain breeds pose serious physical dangers even to experienced handlers who should know better.
The Thought Experiment: Twenty Francis Ngannous vs. One Gorilla
When presented with a thought experiment about how many Francis Ngannou-caliber athletes it would take to catch — not kill — a gorilla, Holston estimated around 20, provided all engaged the animal simultaneously. He then added a dimension that speaks to his understanding of both animal behavior and human psychology: the moment one participant was severely injured, he suggested, the resolve of the remaining participants would collapse almost immediately.
The observation underscores a consistent thread in Holston's thinking — that human beings, even elite ones, operate under psychological constraints that compound an already overwhelming physical disadvantage when confronting large, powerful animals. For Holston, his wrestling background and blue belt in BJJ are genuine tools, but ones he holds with clear-eyed humility when measured against the natural world.