The Claim and the Argument
Johnson came to widespread public attention after posting a video asserting that he could defeat a chimpanzee in a one-on-one fight. The video surpassed 5 million views and generated substantial online debate, with Johnson making a case grounded explicitly in his grappling background.
His central argument rested on a strength equivalence claim: that a chimpanzee is roughly twice as strong as the average human, and that his lifetime of grappling and wrestling places him at a comparable strength level — effectively neutralizing what he characterized as the animal's primary physical advantage. He pushed back on widely repeated figures about chimpanzee strength directly: "'Oh, it's six times stronger than a human.' First of all, no it's not. You're hearing s**t from the Internet and regurgitating it. A chimpanzee is two times the strength of the average human. You know who else is two times the strength of an average human? Me. I've been grappling and wrestling my whole life."
Tactical Approach and Fight Strategy
Johnson's proposed tactical approach is grappling-centric. His primary plan involves maintaining distance to tire the animal over a few minutes before closing to execute a slam. If the chimpanzee immediately closes the distance, his contingency is to attempt a knockout through a slam on impact. He expressed confidence in executing a slam from a wide variety of positions regardless of the animal's grip — citing his wrestling training — and identified protection of the neck and groin as his primary defensive priorities. His stated intent was direct: "I'm picking it up by its arm, f**king slamming it on the concrete, bro. I don't care if it bites or I can bite too."
Proposed Bout Conditions
The proposed bout involves a male chimpanzee with a documented history of aggression toward humans. Johnson confirmed no modifications to the animal's natural weapons are planned — "They're not going to cut the teeth. They're not going to cut the claws or anything like that" — while a tranquilizer team would stand by as a last resort if the outcome becomes decisively dangerous. The setting would be an outdoor grass enclosure. Johnson stated his intent is neither to kill the animal nor to die in the attempt: "I want to go against this wild animal and test myself against it. I don't want to k*ll this wild animal and I don't want to di3."
Johnson named $500,000 as the threshold that would induce him to attempt the fight on a live broadcast, and a website — wavyvschimp.com — has been created around the proposal. A first offer fell through after Johnson concluded the organizer lacked credibility, describing him publicly as a "bullshi**er." A second offer, reported as of September 2026 and for a larger sum, came from parties Johnson characterized as more legitimate, though "not fully above board."
The Scientific Backdrop
The scientific context behind Johnson's claims is more complicated than his argument suggests. Research indicates chimpanzee muscle produces roughly 1.33 times the peak force and power of comparable human muscle, a gap driven by a substantially higher proportion of fast-twitch fibers — a difference considered especially significant in grappling-like scenarios where explosive output matters most. Eddie Hall, the 2017 World's Strongest Man, offered relevant first-hand perspective: "I have actually met and had the, like, been in physical contact with a chimpanzee, which is nowhere near the size of the big gorillas. And their grip strength is another level."
A YouGov survey found that 17% of respondents believed they could beat a chimpanzee in hand-to-hand combat, situating Johnson's claim within a broader public conversation about the limits of human combat capability — one he has engaged with more directly and more specifically than most.
Johnson has also referenced a separate claim involving a polar bear reportedly attacking people near the Arctic Circle and slated for euthanasia, stating he had been in contact with a local tribe and offered money to fight the animal with a sword. He acknowledged having no formal swordsmanship background while expressing conditional confidence: "With a big sword, I think I have that one as well," noting he would require a dedicated training camp with a blade before attempting it.